On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:40:36 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > There's informal, unofficial activity (disclaimer: I'm one of the > instigators) on the HTTP WG list to revise RFC2616, but the stated > intent is to get a WG and make it formal. See: > <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/> And that will also define a registration mechanism for HTTP headers which requires the use of ABNF as opposed to EBNF? Anyway, I'll have a look once the rest is settled... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 18:09:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT