Re: [AC] Publishing another access-control draft

On 2007-02-13 12:39:41 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>>This version presents the "global exceptions" approach as,
>>basically, a done deal.

> Nothing is a done deal in a working draft, imo.

True; I phrased that badly.  What I meant was that no issue around
it was explicitly called out.

>>I'd strongly prefer the "local exceptions" approach that I had
>>proposed to go into the next working draft.  Since I understand
>>that you don't feel very strongly either way (and haven't seen
>>anyone else chime in on this point), please change things
>>accordingly before publishing the draft.

> Heh, you make it sound like it's simple.

It is!

> I agree it's slightly nicer although it does complicate the model
> and increases the likelyhood people make mistakes (I think).

That's where we disagree. ;)

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>