W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > December 2007

Re: [access-control] Editorial: section 1 Access Control for Cross-site Requests

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:39:47 +0100
To: elharo@metalab.unc.edu, public-appformats@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t26i8lhh64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

The latest editor's draft can be found here:

   http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/


On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:33 +0100, Elliotte Rusty Harold  
<elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> Two suggestions:
>
> 1. There should be a comma after "to be able to access it"

Added.


> 2. I'm not quite sure what you're driving at, but I think example.com  
> would be a better choice than hello-world.invalid.

We need two distinct domain names so using example.com twice is a  
non-starter. As both of these are allowed per RFC 2606 I'm not sure what  
the problem is.


> Also, if you want [access-control] at the beginning of the subject line,  
> you should set your mailto links so that happens automatically. e.g.
>
> mailto:public-appformats@w3.org?Subject=[access%20control]

Done.


I also took some time to revise the introduction text before it to  
(hopefully) make it even more clear.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 16:38:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:24 GMT