W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > September 2006


From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:47:45 +0100
To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
Cc: public-appformats@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.te7npvjt64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:03:37 +0100, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
> It's always been a mystery to me as to why   people advocating
> tag-soup continuation assert "we can build a DOM from tag-soup"
> but then immediately insist on never doing failure recovery when
> parsing  xhtml.

Partially because a pretty large community (as I perceive it anyway)  
considers that to be harmful. I also don't really see the point in doing  
failure recovery when parsing XHTML, except perhaps for debugging, but  
then sites that fail are most likely not debugged in your product anyway.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 17:48:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:05 UTC