Le 6 oct. 06 à 07:23, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote: >> >> Are there specific requirements for authoring tools that the WG >> didn't >> think about? It's one of the reproaches made to W3C on a regular >> basis. >> If there are such requirements, please say so. > > It isn't clear to me how we can mention comments that we didn't think > about. We didn't think about them, by definition. Could you detail > exactly > what text you would like us to add which would satisfy your comment? Interesting answer but comments are not reproaches. Let's try to rephrase in a better English. What I meant is "Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it intentional to not talk about them?" Hope it helps to clarify the question. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 00:59:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT