W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and Authoring Tools

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:59:19 +0900
Message-Id: <336E9707-4284-4B42-AB14-62878FDC87B4@w3.org>
Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

Le 6 oct. 06 à 07:23, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote:
>> Are there specific requirements for authoring tools that the WG  
>> didn't
>> think about? It's one of the reproaches made to W3C on a regular  
>> basis.
>> If there are such requirements, please say so.
> It isn't clear to me how we can mention comments that we didn't think
> about. We didn't think about them, by definition. Could you detail  
> exactly
> what text you would like us to add which would satisfy your comment?

Interesting answer but comments are not reproaches. Let's try to  
rephrase in a better English.
What I meant is
	"Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it  
intentional to not talk about them?"

Hope it helps to clarify the question.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 00:59:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:50:05 UTC