On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Doug Schepers wrote: > > I would like to request an extension of the XBL2 LC period. I apologize > for the inconvenience, but I suspect many people have been very busy > with recent W3C activities (several of the SVG WG, for example), and for > my own part, I have had (and will have) tight work schedules leading up > to the holidays. > > I think that on the whole, the specification is technically sound (if > terse), and does not need substantial revision. However, I would like > the opportunity for myself and particularly those who invested time in > the sXBL specification to give a thorough review. > > I think that mid to late January would provide ample time for this, and > would not unduly delay the specification. That would be fine by me. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 05:06:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT