- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:35:27 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
PS: I dissapointed to here that the examples are not relevant .... I think that the examples are extremely useful for implementation. From my point of view this is an inconsistency in the specification, that deserves to be addressed in any of the possible way: - changing the definition as proposed in ticket - adding a NOTE to excplicitly indicate, that in the most cases the IRIs should be dereferencable, but there might (MAY) be cases in which they are not - adding an example with non dereferencable IRIs (i.e. URNs) Any of the solutions are ok for me, as long ... as the issue is addressed > None of the IRI-s _defined_ in the WA spec are necessarily HTTP URIs. The fact that there are no such cases in the examples is not really relevant. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/372#issuecomment-258097031 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 09:35:33 UTC