Re: Revising http://w3.org/annotation/

Nice catch Paolo!

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think that is a good idea, I would also think of updating the Wikipedia
> page with the link/references to the documents (they are just listed now):
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_annotation
>
> Best,
> Paolo
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Now that 2 out of our 3 documents have hit CR and our focus for the next
>> few months is pretty cemented, I’d like to propose that we revisit the
>> content at http://w3.org/annotation/
>>
>>
>>
>> I’d like to see it focused mostly on four things (and in this order if
>> possible):
>>
>> - overview/intro
>>
>> - documents and their states
>>
>> - implementation encouragement
>>
>> - testing
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m happy to run point on this, if that would help.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’d like it to serve as a great landing page for folks interested in
>> using and building on Web Annotation Data Model, Vocab, and Protocol (when
>> that’s fully baked).
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Benjamin
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> Principal Knowledge and Software Engineer at PerkinElmer Innovation Lab
> Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
>
> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 15:56:09 UTC