- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:04:58 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> This discussion already took place with the outcome that is currently in the documents that @type/rdf:type was not mandatory for SpecificResource. I don't see any new information to reopen that issue beyond feedback that type is expected by implementers. > > I'm going to leave this open, but I do not think we need to discuss it until there's additional feedback from the community. > Actually, for our own admin, it would be better to close this issue referring to the discussion that happened (and close) elsewhere. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/137#issuecomment-172055175 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 19:05:00 UTC