- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:03:40 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
gsergiu has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation: == Definition of specific resources: @Type == Here is the current definition for Type of Specific resources: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#specific-resources @Type The class of the Specific Resource The Specific Resource MAY have the SpecificResource. I would expect that the Specific Resource "MUST have" a Type what is one of SpecificResource and its derivates/chlidren (in contrast to "MAY have") I would also imply that @Type is mandatory for the Specific Resources (in order to make it clear for all implementors) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/137 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 11:03:42 UTC