Re: [web-annotation] Rename `role` to `motive`

Actually what is happening adding the **"role"** is that we are adding
 a **semantic** description to the relation between the target and the
 body (at least in the example here: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#roles-for-external-resources).

In our project we are facing more complex situations (i.e. semantic 
annotations with more triples) and for this reason we have a different
 structure (you can see it here: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10XXQ5KrFZbFqKxiFhuVBQrWdSxbXd85cCYYmrXE23QQ/edit#gid=1559801208).

If you plan to start building a controlled vocabularies for roles I 
can suggest you some of the default predicates we use in Pundit 
Annotator Pro: **identifies, is related to, describes, has author, has
 type, cites, quotes, replies to, represents the date**.
These all belongs to standard vocabularies like skos, cito, dc.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by gandreini
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/112#issuecomment-165100818
 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 13:15:56 UTC