- From: Doug Schepers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:36:16 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@BigBlueHat Why should groups (or even access control) only be done via the protocol? What about annotations that are stored locally, or exchanged offline, or otherwise not accessed via the protocol (which not every UA may use)? How is a client supposed to know how to treat those, if there's no property contained in the annotation itself? > it should not be at the UA level, but at the protocol level-- > which I think has been said a few times now It's true that several people have that opinion. I am not yet convinced that a related property shouldn't be in the model, as well, and I've stated the technical reasons why. Saying "some people agree with me" doesn't tell us tell us the technical rationale. -- GitHub Notification of comment by shepazu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/119#issuecomment-161908612 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 08:36:21 UTC