Re: AI KR, Figshare & DOIs

Own
thank you, since the suggestion in the postulate may take foot, better
pin it to a citable resource

since you ve been spoiling us, wonder if it would be possible to render as
stratml
the postulate itself?
*cannot remember what you said about a stratml generator  that would allow
me to do so

re the interplanetary file format, we ll definitely need it

P

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:49 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> To the degree that I understand it, Paola, I agree with your postulate.
> To me, it means the objectives of AI agents should be documented and shared
> in an open, standard, human- and machine-readable format like StratML.
>
> In any event, Figshare's about statement is now available in StratML
> format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#FGSHR
>
> I look forward to learning if they have any plans to:
>
> a) help make research outputs machine-readable
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document> and/or
>
> b) partner with other organizations pursuing common or complementary
> objectives, e.g., the Center for Open Science.
> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#COS
>
> BTW, IDF's about statement is now also in the StratML collection, at
> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IDF  I look forward to learning how
> DOIs might relate to stratml:Identifier(s), which are generally but not
> necessarily GUIDs.
>
> The InterPlanetary File System also comes to mind.
> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IPFSwStyle.xml
>
> Owen
> On 8/25/2019 10:26 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Since posting  discussions about bridging the gap between symbolic and
> subsymbolic, (see related posts) I have formulated a simple postulate, and
> assigned a DOI so that anone following up on these discussions can cite the
> contribution accordingly. I ll be happy to review the postulate with
> comments and suggestions if any
>
> To support AI explainability, learnability,verifiability and
> reproducibility, it is postulated that
> for each MLA *machine learning algorithm,
> there should correspond a natural language expression or other type of
> symbolic knowledge representation
>
> https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9730268.v2
>
> https://figshare.com/articles/A_New_Postulate_for_Knowledge_Representation_in_AI/9730268
>
>
>