On 9 February 2011 09:20, Eduardo Lima Martinez <eduardolima@codecweb.com> wrote: > Hello! > > I'm building a website for people over 16 years of age. This not is a > porn site, but shows raw images ("curcus pretty girls doing ugly > things") not suitable for kids... > > http://www.circusdivas.com/ > > What are the correct PICS labels for this site?. I do not read/write > correctly the english language. > > I do not understand the terms of HTTP headers "Protocol: {...}" and > "PICS-Label: (...)" > > Can you guide me? Can you show me a sample site that has the correct > PICS labels? > > Thank you very much !!! In 2011 PICS is largely obsolete technology. Most of the core functionality of PICS has been rebuilt around RDF (see http://www.w3.org/RDF/ ) ... 1. Roughly PICS label schemes are now RDF Schemas (or more powerfully, OWL Ontologies) 2. PICS Label Bureaus are replaced by Web services that speak W3C's SPARQL language for querying RDF - see http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ 3. PICS' ability to make labels for all pages sharing a common URL pattern is addressed by POWDER - see http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/ However, these RDF technologies are not (yet?) widely used for PICS original use case. In the PICS world, RSACi ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recreational_Software_Advisory_Council ) became ICRA ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Content_Rating_Association ) who became part of FOSI (http://www.fosi.org/icra/) and who no longer have any activities in this technology area, or support for their older work. So there is no direct modern successor to the RSACi/ICRA PICS work to recommend to you. That said, perhaps eg. Internet Explorer still supports the old 1990s work. Perhaps others can comment further? Hope this helps, DanReceived on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 10:50:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 February 2011 10:50:51 GMT