Re: HTTPSSVC record draft

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:21 AM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> Introductory Example: The example record
>
> example.com.      2H  IN HTTPSSVC 0 0 svc.example.net.
>
> does not match the description of the record (missing last field). It
> should be:
>
> example.com.      7200  IN HTTPSSVC 0 0 svc.example.net. “”
>

I think the idea was to omit the SvcFieldValue field from the text
representation in mode 0, where it's unused/disallowed.  Do you think
that's too inconvenient for zone file parsing code? To me, it seems more
natural for humans.

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2019 13:49:56 UTC