- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:37:16 -0400
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Emily Stark <estark@google.com>
Now that -07 is out and not hearing any further comment, we'll submit to the IESG for consideration. Thanks to everyone, especially Emily. Cheers, > On 11 Jul 2018, at 12:32 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Since it's still giving errors, I've generated and attached 06 and a diff for review. > > <draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-06-from-5.diff.html><draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-06.txt> > > > The changes since -06 were to address I-D nits; they haven't been uploaded because the queue is currently closed. > > <draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-07-from-6.diff.html> > > Cheers, > > >> On 10 Jul 2018, at 2:44 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> On 2018-07-09 02:33, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Everyone, >>> It looks like all of the WGLC feedback has been addressed in -06: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct/ >>> Please have a look and raise any remaining issues quickly; hearing nothing, we'll submit to the IESG in the next day or two. >>> Cheers, >> >> tools.ietf.org currently gives me an error, so checking the diffs isn't as easy as usual. >> >> I also note that there have been changes since -06, so I believe a new draft should be submitted before getting it to the IESG... >> >> Best regards, Julian > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2018 15:37:44 UTC