- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 10:09:05 +1000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
On 5 April 2018 at 11:10, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Everyone, > > We've been through an extended WGLC for this document. The editors have incorporated feedback and published a new version: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03 > > Changes from the last WGLC: > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-03.txt > > Because the diff is not trivial (see 3.2. Shift Buffer Representations), we're having a second WGLC, ending on 19-04-2018. > > Please send feedback, statements of support or otherwise to the mailing list, or open new issues. If you spoke up during the 1st WGLC to support this, we'd appreciate hearing from you again. > > Regards, > The new chunk of text in 3.2 seems to address the big concern I had, about shift buffer representations. The earlier references (including ABNF) are also appreciated. I assume the RFC editor will deal with the capitalisation of "Very Large Value" vs "very large value". I'm still not sure about the double-caret exponentiation syntax, though: I've never seen it written like "2^^63" or "2^^53". Is this a thing? Cheers -- Matthew Kerwin https://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2018 00:09:31 UTC