- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:10:45 +0200
- To: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:57:47AM -0700, Piotr Sikora wrote: > Hi Willy, > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > > So if that's done only after the sender has received the recipient's > > SETTINGS frame, I think it's safe, possibly at the cost of an extra RTT, > > unless such behaviour could be enforced by configuration where that makes > > sense. > > Well, it just means that the first few requests would be sent with > base64 encoded binary header field values (i.e. using standard RFC7540 > rules), and after receiving recipient's SETTINGS frame with this > extension, sender would start sending "raw" binary header field values > prefixed with NUL byte (0x00). > > Hope this clarifies things! Yes that's my understanding as well. Willy
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2017 08:11:09 UTC