- From: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:57:47 -0700
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Craig Tiller <ctiller@google.com>
Hi Willy, On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > So if that's done only after the sender has received the recipient's > SETTINGS frame, I think it's safe, possibly at the cost of an extra RTT, > unless such behaviour could be enforced by configuration where that makes > sense. Well, it just means that the first few requests would be sent with base64 encoded binary header field values (i.e. using standard RFC7540 rules), and after receiving recipient's SETTINGS frame with this extension, sender would start sending "raw" binary header field values prefixed with NUL byte (0x00). Hope this clarifies things! Best regards, Piotr Sikora
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2017 07:58:10 UTC