W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4891)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:33:23 -0500
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, michbish@microsoft.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1796B599-8918-4652-A372-D83AE1EC1B86@mnot.net>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
SGTM.

> On 17 Dec. 2016, at 2:52 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2016-12-16 23:17, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
>> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4891
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Mike Bishop <michbish@microsoft.com>
>> 
>> Section: 3.2.6
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> qdtext         = HTAB / SP /%x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> qdtext         = HTAB / SP / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Lack of space between the slash and the alternative makes it unclear that the slash isn't part of the next alternative.
>> ...
> 
> Not a bug, but certainly an improvement.
> 
> "Held for document update"?

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:33:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 December 2016 16:34:06 UTC