W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4891)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:52:28 +0100
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, mnot@mnot.net
Cc: michbish@microsoft.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <cfb15da7-2631-ee90-749c-d4a7f2774601@greenbytes.de>
On 2016-12-16 23:17, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4891
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mike Bishop <michbish@microsoft.com>
>
> Section: 3.2.6
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> qdtext         = HTAB / SP /%x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> qdtext         = HTAB / SP / %x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E / obs-text
>
> Notes
> -----
> Lack of space between the slash and the alternative makes it unclear that the slash isn't part of the next alternative.
> ...

Not a bug, but certainly an improvement.

"Held for document update"?
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2016 07:53:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 17 December 2016 07:53:15 UTC