W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpdxHWj97S=A+Xtf5k3aWfSWg6AStxji4PKemw=xnH_XQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com>
wrote:

> so that existing clients of WS subprotocol



you had me at subprotocol.

which one(s)? Pointers to definitions? It would be interesting to see how
well that mechanism took off - mostly I've seen it used for versioning.

but secondarily, sub-protocol negotiation is part of the js api so I
probably need a little clarification about what you have in mind as the gap
you objected to wrt subprotocol. Thanks.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03:32 UTC