W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:01:05 +0100
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b8b968d7-902f-f975-d0a6-c1273e496bab@gmx.de>
On 2016-10-15 10:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <201610150820.u9F8KlU6025186@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>, Kari Hurtta writes
> :
>
>> Headers which may use rfc5987bis are then "uncommon structure".
>
> I think rfc5987 is a bad idea, and it is one of my motivations for
> pushing for Common Structure.
>
>> "Content-Disposition" and "Link" are not mentioned
>> on draft-kamp-httpbis-structure.
>
> No, I only surveyed RFC723x.
> ...

Content-Disposition already fits.

Link could be integrated by allowing the coded-URL production as identifier.

(And we might we want to discuss whether coded-URL should be allowed as 
value as well).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:01:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:01:47 UTC