- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:44:01 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: internet-drafts@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-10-11 00:42, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 11 October 2016 at 04:03, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> As far as I can see, you are now introducing a new HTTP header syntax, > > > Not as far as I can see. If we accept the premise that the common > structure is "list of (thing plus parameters)" then this fits that as > long as "thing" is permitted to be null. This is consistent with > Forwarded-For and Cache-Control, for instance. (I didn't make this > comment when reviewing your draft, because I don't think we're at that > point just yet.) Indeed. However, this falls apart if the header field allows valueless parameters. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:44:47 UTC