W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:42:57 +0900
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU_+qg4S8rXTH2QHuBgJB+V4_0h2+Gr5pqpE7VEua-AbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
On 12 November 2016 at 17:37, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> The alternative is to find a different solution for that draft, like
>> moving the keys to the payload.
> Yes, that's how it actually started.


> The question remains whether a common mechanism is desirable/needed.

I'm on the fence, and that suggests that committing to doing a common
mechanism in this document is probably the wrong decision.  I don't
like building new mechanisms with such a low level of certainty about
Received on Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:43:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:43:32 UTC