W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:37:50 +0100
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <7ffff023-7e82-1f74-8d2d-e0f0a08d8f5a@gmx.de>
On 2016-11-12 09:32, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 12 November 2016 at 17:18, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
>> If I understand correclty  Eric Rescorla suggest own specification:
>>
>>         Crypto-Key header field for HTTP Encrypted Content-Encoding
>>
>>
>> Essentially moving
>>
>> 3.  Crypto-Key Header Field
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04#section-3
>>
>> to that specification.
>>
>> Then also there need something to be done with examples.
>
> The alternative is to find a different solution for that draft, like
> moving the keys to the payload.

Yes, that's how it actually started.

The question remains whether a common mechanism is desirable/needed.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 12 November 2016 08:38:31 UTC