W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:38:28 +0000
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB270876C3D24778ADEA23CAD487D00@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Sadly, yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk] 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:15 PM
To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

In message <CAEK7mvp5zDw7uo6ZP3KOhQiWWDuoEBAay5wPWYRgpoCNgnsidw@mail.gmail.com>
, Matt Menke writes:

>No, that would be treated as an HTTP/0.9 response.

Wow... that's a lot more tolerant than I would have expected.

Do you really still see HTTP/0.9 reponses in the wild ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 21:39:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 17 October 2016 21:39:05 UTC