W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:44:08 +0100 (CET)
To: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "amankin@verisign.com" <amankin@verisign.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603161441030.26615@tvnag.unkk.fr>
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) wrote:

> The document refers to several TCPM RFCs with experimental status, e.g., in 
> Section 3. That may have to be taken into account when heading towards BCP 
> status.

Several? I can only find one reference, and that is to Tail Loss Probe in a 
section that is still to be written/ripped out.

Does anyone have any particular advice when it comes to tail loss and HTTP/TCP 
that we should put there?


  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:44:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC