W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12.txt

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:30:32 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVfZu5e1fOAOAgaxPR=mRS+xv+oDFN1gHRUFamEk_=VtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
On 10 February 2016 at 14:31, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> This is difficult to specify; one way we could do it is to specify the way we know here (using HTTPS with a strong cert), and require other ways to update this specification (with an Updates: field on the Standards Track).

This seems reasonable.  If h2c starts to see wider deployment, then a
good definition for that that assurance might look like will have to
emerge (or alt-svc won't be used there).
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 08:31:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC