On 2015-12-13 22:29, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 14 December 2015 at 04:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> "Receiving an ALTSVC frame is semantically equivalent to receiving an >> Alt-Svc header field. As a result, the ALTSVC frame causes alternative >> services for the corresponding origin to be replaced. Note that it would be >> unwise to mix use of Alt-Svc header fields with the use of ALTSVC frames, as >> the sequence of receipt might be hard to predict." > > > WFM -> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/62a1b0dd6f0a1985ff3691317c260568b1b3fd7a>Received on Monday, 14 December 2015 08:12:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC