Re: alt svc issue #126 clarify invalidation rules wrt altsvc frame

On 2015-12-13 22:29, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 14 December 2015 at 04:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> "Receiving an ALTSVC frame is semantically equivalent to receiving an
>> Alt-Svc header field. As a result, the ALTSVC frame causes alternative
>> services for the corresponding origin to be replaced. Note that it would be
>> unwise to mix use of Alt-Svc header fields with the use of ALTSVC frames, as
>> the sequence of receipt might be hard to predict."
>
>
> WFM

-> 
<https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/62a1b0dd6f0a1985ff3691317c260568b1b3fd7a>