- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:11:53 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-12-13 22:29, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 14 December 2015 at 04:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> "Receiving an ALTSVC frame is semantically equivalent to receiving an >> Alt-Svc header field. As a result, the ALTSVC frame causes alternative >> services for the corresponding origin to be replaced. Note that it would be >> unwise to mix use of Alt-Svc header fields with the use of ALTSVC frames, as >> the sequence of receipt might be hard to predict." > > > WFM -> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/62a1b0dd6f0a1985ff3691317c260568b1b3fd7a>
Received on Monday, 14 December 2015 08:12:32 UTC