W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: alt svc issue #126 clarify invalidation rules wrt altsvc frame

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:29:18 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVpJHYaXiuQZ3+SY7+B2aVr9LdADG3bWHjEmrY29XO_7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 December 2015 at 04:41, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> "Receiving an ALTSVC frame is semantically equivalent to receiving an
> Alt-Svc header field. As a result, the ALTSVC frame causes alternative
> services for the corresponding origin to be replaced. Note that it would be
> unwise to mix use of Alt-Svc header fields with the use of ALTSVC frames, as
> the sequence of receipt might be hard to predict."

Received on Sunday, 13 December 2015 21:29:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC