W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Adjustments to our work mode - please read

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:55:02 +1100
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-Id: <E240F469-B4E4-4336-878B-A2E0B529EF7D@mnot.net>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Hi Ted,

I think you're talking about the first one, which was pushed out by the [http-issues] prefix. I've since removed that, reducing the likelihood of this happening.

Also, that appears to be only an artefact of the Web interface, not the e-mail list itself.

Cheers,






> On 7 Oct 2015, at 3:18 am, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote:
> - Provide a separate, announce-only mailing list that is subscribed to every issue change, for those who do not want to use a github account to receive notifications. See: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-issues>
> 
> Note that GitHub comments can be edited and deleted after the fact, so it is very important that the http-issues list be a reliable archive of all the communication.
> 
> 
> ​Brian's comment caused me to go look at the archive, which is found here:  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=http-issues#
> 
> There is a bit of a problem using the new mailing list archive system with the current method. As it stands, the mailing list archive truncates the subject of the email after a certain point (apparently no matter what the width of the window it won't go beyond a certain number of characters).  Because the issue numbers come at the end of the line, the issue number drops off.  This is already visible in the archive, even though there are only three messages.
> 
> Any chance we can massage github to move the issue numbers to the front?  
> 
> Also, it was not entirely clear to me from the headers whether the mailing list archive system threading will work correctly with these messages.  By any chance, did you test that with another list?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 06:55:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:39 UTC