Re: Call for Adoption: draft-fielding-http-key

I support adoption.

`Key` would be very helpful for Client-Hints and for content negotiation
and adaptation in general, enabling origins and CDNs to adapt the content
to the user's situation (as reflected in Client-Hints or in similar headers
added by Service Workers) while maintaining its cachability in the
browser's cache and in supporting intermediaries (while maintaining a
`Vary` based fallback for non-supporting caches).

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> We discussed this document in Dallas:
>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fielding-http-key>
> ... as well as on and off since then.
>
> Based on the feedback received and after discussion with our Area
> Director, I believe that we should adopt this document as a WG product,
> with a target of Proposed Standard.
>
> Since I'm an author on the document, I've asked Martin Thomson to be
> Document Shepherd, to help judge consensus both of the CfA and during the
> document's LC, should we adopt it. He has graciously agreed.
>
> Please comment on-list; we’ll make a decision about adoption at the end of
> next week. The result of this CfA will also help us determine how to go
> forward with the Client Hints document.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>