- From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:47:39 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, Laura Kataja <Laura.Kataja@iki.fi>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>: (Fri Oct 2 07:54:24 2015) > I was thinking perhaps of spqr.example.org/<something> Senatus Populusque Romanus ? http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/romeancientrome/qt/spqr.htm > On Oct 1, 2015 8:08 PM, "Kari Hurtta" <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote: > >> Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>: (Thu Oct 1 23:48:23 2015) >>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Kari Hurtta < >> hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Yeah, good catch. If someone wants to propose a URL for the entity >>>>> blocking the People’s Front of Judea, I’ll wire that in. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Link: <http://example.com/murus-incendii.html>; rel=blocked-by >>>> >>>> (from Laura Kataja) >>>> >>>> / Kari Hurtta >>>> >>>> >>> I think you're aiming for "firewall" rendered in Latin. You might try >>> "vallum" (rampart) or "fossa" (moat). Or, given that the Romans had >>> censors, "magister morum". >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Ted >> >> Yes, firewall was quite natural blocing party when message was >> >> This request may not be serviced in the Roman Province >> of Judea due to the Lex Julia Majestatis, which disallows >> access to resources hosted on servers deemed to be >> operated by the People's Front of Judea. >> >> Yes, rampart or moat are quite possible blocking parties >> on here. >> >> I left Latin to Laura. >> >> / Kari Hurtta >> ( not member of the mailing list )
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 14:08:19 UTC