W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:54:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuiRHVjJmyQFM-Ap3RbC2hx-nDQu2cn-__NgtHK_GHFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: Laura Kataja <Laura.Kataja@iki.fi>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I was thinking perhaps of spqr.example.org/<something>
On Oct 1, 2015 8:08 PM, "Kari Hurtta" <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:

> Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>: (Thu Oct  1 23:48:23 2015)
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Kari Hurtta <
> hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, good catch.  If someone wants to propose a URL for the entity
> > > > blocking the People’s Front of Judea, I’ll wire that in.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Link: <http://example.com/murus-incendii.html>; rel=blocked-by
> > >
> > > (from Laura Kataja)
> > >
> > > / Kari Hurtta
> > >
> > >
> > ​I think you're aiming for "firewall" rendered in Latin.  You might try
> > "vallum" (rampart) or "fossa" (moat).  Or, given that the Romans had
> > censors, "magister morum".
> >
> > ​regards,
> >
> > Ted​
>
> Yes, firewall was quite natural blocing party when message was
>
>      This request may not be serviced in the Roman Province
>      of Judea due to the Lex Julia Majestatis, which disallows
>      access to resources hosted on servers deemed to be
>      operated by the People's Front of Judea.
>
> Yes, rampart or moat are quite possible blocking parties
> on here.
>
> I left Latin to Laura.
>
> / Kari Hurtta
> ( not member of the mailing list )
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 04:54:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:39 UTC