W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, was: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:15:03 +0200
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <560D23C7.9070708@gmx.de>
On 2015-10-01 14:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <560D2065.5060803@greenbytes.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>
>> We could. But then we'd define something new, instead of just updating a
>> specification of something that has been used for something like 15
>> years already.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> We can and should new ways to address this (and the JSON-in-field-values
>> spec is one proposal). But this is not the spec to do this.
>
> So why bother updating a 15 year old spec, why not focus on the
> JSON-in-field-values stuff and move forward ?

Because I'd like to have accurate documentation of a format that is in 
use and isn't going to go away.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 12:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:39 UTC