W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, was: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:06:08 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <15912.1443701168@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <560D2065.5060803@greenbytes.de>, Julian Reschke writes:

>We could. But then we'd define something new, instead of just updating a 
>specification of something that has been used for something like 15 
>years already.
>We can and should new ways to address this (and the JSON-in-field-values 
>spec is one proposal). But this is not the spec to do this.

So why bother updating a 15 year old spec, why not focus on the
JSON-in-field-values stuff and move forward ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 12:06:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:39 UTC