- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:54:13 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/12/2014 12:21 a.m., Virgil Griffith wrote: >> What this doesn’t cover is a workplace filtering out Facebook >> because > it’s a time-waster. What it also doesn’t cover is opt-in filtering > services, such as parents might get so their kids don’t see > inappropriate content. > > You could cover this case of "non-legally-compelled blocking" with > error code 511. It's a non-standard use, but it's the closest > thing I can think of. 511 is designed to be part of authentication. There are potentially tools out there which see 511 and kick off out-of-band authentication procedures without user interaction. Mixing the "absolute forbidden" meaning of 451 into 511 just creates confusion. Amos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUkXz1AAoJELJo5wb/XPRjKe8H/j2EEK13ubbAaqlC7gcytF7r 32jSpskDwcX1Lh+LxJzJf18azDYwYLswfqbnbEbmKwDgVnrfzmy0d55irie5EfYY S/h7beDkECUnd5fSWZ1h5UHGJD4tAy2kV3xpd/nfsZlET5IcQksQLcy4ZOc32yQ4 3SXk6BJN4baEFIr5ILgBcOf13erEyokjukRUyyvANM65FZjHWEoXeMhggAY+P3ki s3ZTsJ69Xrm+rZ1XEMk/granGZH28NMpquTa8zPCvjVrN1rf0JGq/DCUTfU1Si+V FhuaTRWq77Vm0AYGX1b4/Zdo2/ZUWz5cY0Rx680gtNy5u1bpRhnNN7JhBx6C+kE= =e1qB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 12:54:51 UTC