W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:11:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_j_k6YAqt-Jxrxk0---eXQF8Y9ngBVx39dp-5ZcrOJ+jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> While I understand the scenario, it seems more appropriate for the client to send the RST_STREAM(OK) if it decides to abort sending the rest of the body.

I think that should be valid as well. Basically I think either should
be able to tear down the stream via RST_STREAM(OK) without the other
considering it an error, and that the text should be clarified to make
it explicit.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 16:12:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC