W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 padding

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:27:21 +1200
Message-ID: <5406FB19.2020800@treenet.co.nz>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/09/2014 6:34 p.m., Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> -------- In message
> <CAFewVt4K3oWXVO-0=M+iCVp8KEiutJ3zDM7YoUO=7FZONK3STg@mail.gmail.com>
>
> 
, Brian Smith writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
>> wrote:
>>> What do people think of Roy=E2=80=99s subsequent proposal to
>>> have a separ=
>> ate padding frame and always send it? Please be aware that
>> changing the pad= ding scheme would necessitate another round of
>> security review.
>> 
>> Consider an implementation that sends every frame in its own TCP 
>> packet, perhaps with a 1 minute delay between frames. [...]
> 
> If this was a joke, you forgot the smiley.
> 
> If it wasn't, please explain why we should even think about
> entertaining the convenience of such an implementation, when 3/4 of
> the browsers cannot even think of a reason to support non-TLS
> traffic.
> 

HTTP/2 over DTLS.

Amos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUBvsZAAoJELJo5wb/XPRj1/gH/i5taIlRim4VGboHafPGYdhh
9dOdgxj3zJlkXUPZJuXVD1ragRAXJtgJC8+eeJrjpmYc0KtOxhkDx32RzgVX8LuX
9i5fT7qn0Otz0+rfJeR9CK7seUKQPCYokrbDQEgvZ/WBigE+ACoKf3GreCJdauoc
yf7TJCifVTdEMXvE8NMUb9kqD76lfPCYaX/7ZUj2Ocovk3LhL8neFFQZR4yLzbnU
ljKyWP+XQ2xFgDYz6fbJ2LTN3URCeyp0y1ltgnCqqVxDuN/qL5+YlTZ+tKiHbRmg
7PLRAkTUMikyyORIY3+SpTsTKLqhGW82VeZPC2RTzZcFW/x+sm9Q8p+RdUCc60I=
=4cEX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 11:27:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC