W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: h2 priority

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:03:06 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGtu=B=Du5EGJrJa9-Brd0GV-xFCikBfhhtZecq7PfkHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 3 September 2014 16:42, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> As you point out, this would incur the overhead of an additional frame;
> AIUI browsers want to set priority for every request, so this would
> effectively double the frame overhead for all of their requests.

So surely priority should be sent as a HTTP header like all other request
meta data?
For pushed responses, priority could be adjusted with a stream setting.

> So, what do people think?

That there are a lot of issues that many would try to get over a lowered

Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 07:03:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:10 UTC