W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 8.1.2.1 Request Header Fields | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, 5.5 Extending HTTP/2

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:35:37 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
cc: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTPBIS working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1360.1405614937@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABkgnnWey=iHxJO9AwOWa146-Cu1g8HJ-yXT8McXyo3W8aXgqw@mail.gmail.com>
, Martin Thomson writes:
>On 16 July 2014 23:24, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> wrote:
>> Then we need only client => server SETTINGS frame with WS_CPABABLE.

>The only problem there is the added delay.  A client can't open a
>websocket in the first flight.

So since this seems to be the standard reply to pretty much everything
else, why doesn't it just negotiate WS with TLS (or Update:) to begin
with ?

Why the detour over HTTP/2 ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 21:53:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC