- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 13:39:20 -0700
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 17 July 2014 13:07, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm afraid we can't really do that without a risk of interoperability > failure. TLS mandates something that we prohibit the use of. > > Now, assuming that the TLS WG can produce a recommendation (probably > in the context of 1.3), we will use that. > > I'm amenable to your suggestion of just ECDHE. One being better than > two when it comes to MTI. I'll note that this is probably something > we should continue in the TLS WG; as we've done so far. I'm sorry, that was a lie: I've included these values because TLS haven't delivered us an answer at this time. I'd prefer if they deliver.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 20:39:47 UTC