W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:05:49 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <26319.1405605949@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <53C7D537.5090902@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>On 2014-07-17 15:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> ...
>> And 1xx apart from those two, I'll not even start to think about
>> until somebody concretely tells us what they are for and what
>> they should do.
>> ...
>They are non-final, and informational. Just pass them along. No rocket 
>science at all.

They are non-existent and incompatible with HTTP/1.  Just forget them.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 14:06:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC