W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Large Frame Proposal

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:52:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNeJCK+R0pGENB=k7ptjt1VGrZm0YkEatMFMX_4JvFcZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sure, good luck with that 85% success rate :)
Makes sense on an intranet. Not so much on the wild, wild internet, unless
things have substantially changed.
-=R


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
wrote:

> On 9 July 2014 13:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Larger framesizes matter only for non-TLS connections.
>> That is why I'll hope that most browsers and most servers pick framesizes
>> that are proportional to the TLS record size, and that are relatively small
>> (e.g. 16k or less).
>>
>>
> Don't forget that some of us are going to be using IE a lot more in
> future, if that lets us use HTTP/2 without TLS.
>
> --
>   Matthew Kerwin
>   http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 06:53:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC