- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 22:38:15 +0000
- To: William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>
- cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAA4WUYgJunXNe4BbZd9ZVJ8QqXZibJ2J9QyCf493ZtU+Ay4hxA@mail.gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGF uICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes: >> And what if the MITM proxies disagree with you about which parts of >> the standard deserve to work and block some of them ? > >> What will you do ? > >Hard fail. User visible error. End users blame the last mover, [...] This is why I called the proposal "blackmail". I think HTTP/2 should strive to be such a good protocol that people will want it, rather than try to intimidate any dissent with thinly veiled "Nice website you have here, pity if anything happened to it..." threats. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 22:38:37 UTC