- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:31:57 +0000
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- cc: Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Jesse Wilson <jesse@swank.ca>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CA+pLO_gzKNhCXTvf7Uwkcky2uEWiUYJNnH-ArxuJOSyC-ic_Eg@mail.gmail.com>, Jeff Pinner writes: >The client can't send END_STREAM to close the response early since >that would not differentiate an incomplete payload body from a >complete one. It would need to send RST to indicate early termination >of the payload. Given that the server already said "Screw the payload", I can't see what difference that could possibly make to anybody, but if RST makes you more happy, then send RST... The worst that can happen is that you pollute error-log on the server. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 20:32:21 UTC