Re: Priority straw man from Martin Thomson on 2014-01-29 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:25:33 -0800
To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWAko6Z8x5CsMw1Lt6k-gUvam6ZO4+TOHcCGJCF0=UP-g@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 January 2014 05:51, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I propose that PRIORITY can be sent to stream ID = 0. In this case,
> stream dependency
> field must be 0 and the receiver of this frame changes the weight of the
> specified priority group and does not change the relative ordering inside
> it.


Interesting proposal.  It is more code to handle another scenario,
maybe; but definitely less work required to reprioritize.

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 17:26:00 UTC