- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:37:43 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <8170731E-E9A2-4A64-8087-F543DC163454@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >That said, if an implementation wanted to publish an Informational RFC >documenting their HTTP2-friendly log format, that's entirely doable, >and I'm sure they'd get some help if they asked. Purely as a matter of making it easier for people to adopt HTTP/2.0, it might be a good idea to be a *little* bit more proactive than that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 14:38:11 UTC