- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:33:40 +0800
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 Jan 2014, at 12:37 am, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > In message <alpine.DEB.2.00.1401061128260.3079@wnl.j3.bet>, Yves Lafon writes: > >>> One of my users asked and I couldn't answer, so I'm passing it on: >>> >>> Who will (and when will they) standardize how NCSA log format >>> works with HTTP/2.0, in particular for "new" stuff like PUSH ? >>> >>> My cursory research indicates that W3C has documented the NCSA >>> format (somewhat) but it is not clear to me if they actually >>> consider themselves steward of the standardisation ? >> >> The document is from... 1996 [1], so the space is up for grab. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-logfile.html > > Yes, that's how I derived that W3C didn't seem to be very interested. > > Are we ? Hmm. It’s not really a standard in the sense that IETF does them, and I don’t know of any other log formats that have been standardised in that sense. That said, if an implementation wanted to publish an Informational RFC documenting their HTTP2-friendly log format, that’s entirely doable, and I’m sure they’d get some help if they asked. Cheers, Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 08:34:11 UTC